Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Unreasonable men: God bless them!
"All progress depends upon the unreasonable man." -- George Bernard Shaw. All progress, and all discovery of truth, too. For recovery from common error can only begin as a minority opinion, which is why there is no such thing as a science by consensus, whatever the climate change lobby say.
Tuesday, April 25, 2006
Logic, truth and politics
Madsen Pirie's new book, 'How to win every argument: the use and abuse of logic' is just out. A handy guide to logical fallacies, the book is faintly disturbing for being written in the style of a manual for trainee politicians out to win arguments by employing such fallacies. Saved, or hoping to be saved, by its studied air of irony with which it advises when the petitio principi can be got away with, this leaves an odd taste in the mouth. Of course we know that much of our national and parliamentary discourse is eristic and not dialectical, concerned with scoring points and winning out rather than coming to the truth. Still, it is disturbing to find a book that so cold-bloodedly plays to that audience. A Sophist's Handbook would appear to be a suitable alternative title. Still, it will find an avid audience among those aiming at the green benches or even just the comfy chairs of television studios. For those who have an interest in truth, it can also clarify their appreciation of the tricks that are being played. Pirie is rather unsavoury for playing to both audiences at once. Unfortunately, if it isn't a book you can love, it is a book both sides can use. Have a read.
Monday, April 10, 2006
Most human beings 'natural born slaves' - Britain - Times Online
Most human beings 'natural born slaves' - Britain - Times Online
See my earlier comments on positive and negative slavery in 'what does slavery mean?'. Haven't been able to get a copy of his paper, though it sounds fascinating -- not because I want to enslave mankind, but because the nature of freedom is a hard one to think about. We must follow the argument where it leads. Not back to slavery, but in thinking about how some people seem to reject their chance to grab freedom. Can we help them? How? Can the choice to reject freedom be a free choice?
See my earlier comments on positive and negative slavery in 'what does slavery mean?'. Haven't been able to get a copy of his paper, though it sounds fascinating -- not because I want to enslave mankind, but because the nature of freedom is a hard one to think about. We must follow the argument where it leads. Not back to slavery, but in thinking about how some people seem to reject their chance to grab freedom. Can we help them? How? Can the choice to reject freedom be a free choice?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)